Search for: All records

Abstract Endosymbionts are widespread in arthropods, living in host cells with effects that extend from parasitic to mutualistic. Newly acquired endosymbionts tend to be parasitic, but vertical transmission favors coevolution toward mutualism, with hosts sometimes developing dependency. Endosymbionts negatively affecting host fitness may still spread by impacting host reproductive traits, referred to as reproductive “manipulation,” although costs for hosts are often assumed rather than demonstrated. For cytoplasmic incompatibility (CI) that involves endosymbiont‐mediated embryo death, theory predicts directional shifts away from “manipulation” toward reduced CI strength; moreover, CI‐causing endosymbionts need to increase host fitness to initially spread. In nature, endosymbiont–host interactions and dynamics are complex, often depending on environmental conditions and evolutionary history. We advocate for capturing this complexity through appropriate datasets, rather than relying on terms like “manipulation.” Such imprecision can lead to the misclassification of endosymbionts along the parasitism–mutualism continuum.